Nationalist Video`s


Thursday, 10 April 2014

The Labour Party deliberately flooded Britain with Muslim immigration.

In 1997, new Home Secretary Jack Straw rewarded Labour’s Muslim voters by scrapping Britain's toughest immigration law.

This delighted Labour’s Muslim supporters, because they could now move their large extended families to Britain by simply arranging a marriage.

Therefore, Muslim immigration soared with many sham marriages to exploit the generous welfare benefits of British citizenship.

This was only the start of the New Labour Project, intended to radically change Britain's population. Over the next 13 years the Labour government encouraged over five million, mostly Third World immigrants, to come to Britain.

Almost a million Muslims came, fuelling an epidemic of predatory grooming gangs targeting vulnerable English schoolgirls!

In his Evening Standard article of the 23rd October 2009, Andrew Neather, an adviser to both Jack Straw and Tony Blair exposed the true sinister motive behind Labour’s mass immigration policy.

Neather wrote that: “earlier drafts l saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.”

Andrew Neather's shocking revelation was substantiated only a few days later. Someone deliberately leaked other censored parts of Labour’s airbrushed big immigration report that was eventually published by Jack Straw’s Home Office in 2001.

On the 27th October 2009 the Evening Standard printed their scandalous details in an article titled: “Blair’s think tank airbrushed link between crime and immigrants''.
An entire section headed “Criminal Behaviour” warning of the dangers from organised criminal gangs of immigrants exploiting our open borders was removed.

These alien criminal gangs included human traffickers who would sexually exploit vulnerable young girls! Other threats came from drug traffickers, “marriage rackets” and a raft of other foreign fraudsters who would inevitably seek to exploit Britain's open borders.

This section along with prison figures showing a disproportionate number of foreign nationals were removed because Labour feared it would harm their case for relaxing immigration controls.

This leak confirmed Labour ministers knew they would be putting our young daughters at risk from immigrant (mainly Muslim) sex trafficking gangs by opening our borders.

Even so, they censored this danger because they wanted mass immigration to dissolve the identity of the English people!

To drive their mass immigration policy through against the wishes of the English people, The Labour Party has not only used subterfuge. The Labour governments have also introduced every race relations law designed to silence opponents of immigration.

These laws have also intimidated journalists, police and social workers into remaining silent about the widespread Muslim grooming gangs targeting vulnerable English schoolgirls.

Only since Labour left office have there been high profile convictions of gang members with the media properly reporting the full horror and gross depravity of their crimes to the British public.

Labour also imposed “political correctness” throughout the public sector. Therefore, police and social workers, who should have protected vulnerable girls, remained silent about the grooming gangs because accusations of “racism” could destroy their careers and generous final salary pensions.

Following Labour's defeat in the 2010 General Election, a brave journalist, Andrew Norfolk of The Times, finally blew the lid off the scandal. He revealed, in an article dated 5th January 2011, that police and social services had fuelled “a culture of silence” that had allowed hundreds of young white to be exploited by Muslim men for sex.

Chief Inspector Alan Edwards of West Mercia Police was quoted as saying: “everyone's been too scared to address the ethnicity factor. No one wants to stand up and say that Pakistani guys in some parts of the country are recruiting young white girls and passing them around their relatives for sex, but we need to stop being worried about the racial complication.”

Social workers were also scared to speak out. When a large organised group of Pakistani men were finally convicted in 2012 after over a decade of sexual violence against English girls living in children's homes, it emerged that complaints to Rochdale Council's social workers had been ignored because they were all petrified of being called racist.

Nationalists were first to tell the truth about Muslim grooming gangs in 2001. But Labour's race laws now mean “the truth IS NO DEFENCE” when exposing racially “sensitive” truths.

Therefore, the Labour Government already knew of the Pakistani grooming gangs. Ann Cryer, the  Labour Partys Keighley MP had also spoken of Pakistani men grooming underage white girls for sex in her constituency as far back as 2002.

Because very large organised groups of Pakistani men were involved in the sexual exploitation of thousands of English children, the scandal was particularly embarrassing for a Labour Government promoting multiculturalism.

Chancellor, Gordon Brown was so bitterly disappointed about the exposure made by Nationalists, that he wanted to make Labour's anti-free speech race laws even more oppressive.

Thousands of vulnerable English schoolgirls have British Nationalists to thank for their key role in breaking the conspiracy of silence that would have sacrificed them on the altar of political correctness.

Sadly, political correctness and fear of Labour’s race laws still intimidate many journalists and public servants into turning a blind eye to the sexual exploitation of English children. They simply will not risk their careers, pensions, liberty and personal safety.

Final thought.

As the Muslim population grows and the English become a minority, it will become increasingly dangerous for anyone to speak out against the large organised Muslim grooming gangs that target English children.

Who will be prepared to risk their lives and liberty as well as their careers to protect our vulnerable young daughters?.

No comments:

Post a Comment